Prior to the commencement of the meeting, the Convener intimated that this meeting would be recorded for subsequent broadcast via the Council's internet site.

There were no declarations of interest or transparency statements intimated prior to the commencement of the meeting.

There were submitted the undernoted applications for renewal of Late Hours Catering Licences:-

(a) Applicant: Motor Fuel Limited 
Premises: BP Greenock Road Service Station, 10 Greenock Road, Paisley
Activity: Petrol Station
Operating hours: Monday to Sunday – 11.00 pm to 5.00 am
Licence No.: LHC-121

After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of two years and that the applicant continue to be an exception to the Board’s policy on trading hours. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of two years and that the applicant continue to be an exception to the Board’s policy on trading hours.

(b) Applicant: PTLL Limited
Premises: Tesco, Rockfield Service Station, 125 Renfrew Road, Paisley
Activity: Retail
Operating hours: Monday to Sunday – 11.00 pm to 5.00 am
Licence No.: LHC-128

After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of two years and that the applicant continue to be an exception to the Board’s policy on trading hours. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of two years and that the applicant continue to be an exception to the Board’s policy on trading hours.

The Board resolved that the press and public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the following items of business as it was likely, in view of the nature of the business to be transacted, that if members of the press and public were present there would be disclosure to them of exempt information as defined in paragraph 3 of part I of schedule 7A of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973.

There was submitted the undernoted application for surrender and re-issue of a Taxi Operator’s Licence:-

Present Operator: Thomas Baggley
Proposed Operator: Arshad Mahmood
Licence No.: TX124

After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted.

There were submitted the undernoted applications for grant of Private Hire Car Operators’ Licences. The applicants had been asked to appear personally:-

(a) Fazli Asim

Mr Asim, the applicant, joined the meeting. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.

Sederunt

Councillor Montgomery joined the meeting prior to consideration of the following item of business.

(b) Mohammed Gobara

Mr Gobara, the applicant, joined the meeting. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued and that the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued and that the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board.

There were submitted the undernoted applications for grant of Private Hire Car Drivers’ Licences. Applicants (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (l), (m) and (n) had been asked to appear personally together with Police Scotland who had submitted an objection received outwith the statutory timescale to application (g)/(l); representations to applications (h)/(m), (i), (j) and (k); and an objection to application (n):-  

(a) Wally Ade

After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.

(b) Innocent Onwubiko

After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.

(c) Khaled Mohamad J Swaid

After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.

(d) Hadi Aboutalebi Jahromi

After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.

(e) Hussein Suliman

Mr Suliman, the applicant, joined the meeting. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.

(f) Lakhpat Rai 

Mr Rai, the applicant, joined the meeting. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.

Adjournment

The meeting adjourned at 10.40 am and reconvened at 11.10 am

(g) Dila Ram Gaire 

There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Gaire, the applicant. The Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued to later in the meeting to allow the applicant time to join the meeting. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued to later in the meeting to allow the applicant time to join the meeting.

(h) Mohammad Akram

There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Akram, the applicant. The Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued to later in the meeting to allow the applicant time to join the meeting. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued to later in the meeting to allow the applicant time to join the meeting.

(i) Qamar Sharif

Mr Sharif, the applicant, joined the meeting together with Sergeant Robertson, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted a representation to the application. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.

(j) Lynette Mavhura

Ms Mavhura, the applicant, joined the meeting. Sergeant Robertson, remained in the meeting having not left following consideration of the previous item of business, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted a representation to the application. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.

Sederunt

Councillor Montgomery left the meeting prior to the consideration of the following item of business.

(k) McJohn Etinosa

Mr Etinosa, the applicant, joined the meeting. Sergeant Robertson, remained in the meeting having not left following consideration of the previous item of business, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted a representation to the application. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.

(l) Dila Ram Gaire

Under reference to item 4(g) above, consideration was resumed of Mr Gaire’s application. There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Gaire, the applicant. Sergeant Robertson, remained in the meeting having not left following consideration of the previous item of business, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted an objection received outwith the statutory timescale to the application. The Convener proposed that the application be considered in the applicant’s absence. This was agreed unanimously. 

On hearing the reasons for the lateness of the objection, the Convener proposed that the objection be taken into account when the application was being considered. This was agreed unanimously.

After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Board adjourned to allow members to consider this application. The meeting was reconvened and the Convener proposed that the application be refused. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be refused.

(m) Mohammad Akram

Under reference to item 4(h) above, consideration was resumed of Mr Akram’s application. There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Akram, the applicant. Sergeant Robertson, remained in the meeting having not left following consideration of the previous item of business, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted a representation to the application. The Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued and that the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued and that the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board.

Adjournment

The meeting adjourned at 12.20 pm and reconvened at 1.30 pm. 

(n) Naqibullah Eshaqzai

Mr Eshaqzai, the applicant, joined the meeting. Sergeant Robertson, remained in the meeting having not left following consideration of the previous item of business, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted an objection to the application. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Board adjourned to allow members to consider this application. The meeting was reconvened and the Convener proposed that the application be refused. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be refused.

There were submitted the undernoted applications for renewal of Private Hire Car Drivers’ Licences. The applicants had been asked to appear personally together with Police Scotland who had submitted an objection received outwith the statutory timescale to application (a) and a representation to application (b):-

(a) Applicant: Mumtaz Malik
Licence No.: P0357

Mr Malik, the applicant, joined the meeting. Sergeant Robertson, remained in the meeting having not left following consideration of the previous item of business, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted an objection received outwith the statutory timescale to the application.

On hearing the reasons for the lateness of the objection, the Convener proposed that the objection be taken into account when the application was being considered. This was agreed unanimously.

After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be refused.  This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be refused.

(b) Applicant: Paul McCormick
Licence No.: P0226

Mr McCormick, the applicant, joined the meeting. Sergeant Robertson, remained in the meeting having not left following consideration of the previous item of business, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted a representation to the application. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of two years. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of two years.

The Board considered the possible suspension or revocation of the undernoted Private Hire Car Driver’s Licence. The licence holder had been asked to appear personally together with Police Scotland:-

Licence holder: Mohammed Sayem
Licence No.: P6334

Mr Sayem, the licence holder, joined the meeting. Sergeant Robertson, remained in the meeting having not left following consideration of the previous item of business, on behalf of the Chief Constable. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Senior Solicitor (Litigation & Regulatory Services) asked Mr Sayem if he wished to address the Board on any action the Board might impose prior to any motions being made in relation to his Private Hire Car Driver’s Licence. Mr Sayem then addressed the Board. 

Following consideration of Mr Sayem’s submission, the Board adjourned to allow members to consider the matter. The meeting was reconvened and the Convener proposed that consideration of the possible suspension or revocation of Mr Sayem’s Private Hire Car Driver’s Licence be continued and that Mr Sayem be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That consideration of the possible suspension or revocation of Mr Sayem’s Private Hire Car Driver’s Licence be continued and that Mr Sayem be invited to a future meeting of the Board.

There was submitted the undernoted application for renewal of a Private Hire Car Operator’s Licence. The applicant had been asked to appear personally together with Police Scotland who had submitted an objection to the application:-

Licence holder: Mohammed Sayem
Licence No.: PH1410

 

Mr Sayem, the applicant, together with Sergeant Robertson, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted an objection to the application both remained in the meeting having not left following consideration of the previous item of business. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of two years. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of two years.

There was submitted the undernoted application for exemption from mobility assistance duties under the Equality Act 2020. The licence holder had been asked to appear personally:-

Licence holder: Stuart McCullagh
Licence No.: T0020

Mr McCullagh, the applicant, joined the meeting. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for the duration of Mr McCullagh’s current Taxi Driver’s Licence. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for the duration of Mr McCullagh’s current Taxi Driver’s Licence.

There were submitted the undernoted applications for grant of Short-term Let Licences:-

(a) Applicant: Cside Properties Limited
Premises: Flat 2/1, 44A Causeyside Street, Paisley

After consideration of all matters before the Board the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of three years. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of three years.

(b) Applicant: Cside Properties Limited
Premises: Flat 3/1, 44A Causeyside Street, Paisley

After consideration of all matters before the Board the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of three years. This was agreed unanimously.

DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of three years.