3
There were submitted the undernoted applications for the grant of Landlord Registrations.
The applicants had been asked to appear personally for the first time together with Police Scotland who had submitted representations in respect of the applications: -
(a) Stacey Ewing, 55 Ferguslie Park Avenue, Paisley and Robert McCutcheon
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr McCutcheon. Miss Ewing who had an interest in the matter, being registered as a landlord under the Act as a joint owner, was invited into the meeting together with Inspector McLaren and Sergeant Petrie on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted a representation in respect of the application.
The Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to be represented by a family member. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to be represented at a future meeting of the Board.
(b) Mark Troup, 132 Banchory Avenue, Inchinnan
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Troup. Inspector McLaren and Sergeant Petrie on behalf of the Chief Constable, who had submitted a representation in respect of the application, were invited into the meeting.
The Convener proposed that the application be considered in Mr Troup’s absence and this was agreed unanimously.
After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be continued to a future meeting to allow the applicant to appear in person. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued and that the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board.
(c) Leslie Coupe, 12 Tudor Square, Dalton in Furness, Cumbria
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Coupe. Inspector McLaren and Sergeant Petrie on behalf of the Chief Constable, who had submitted a representation in respect of the application, were invited into the meeting.
The Convener proposed that the application be considered in Mr Coupe’s absence and this was agreed unanimously.
After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be refused. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That the application be refused.