Report by Head of Strategic Planning & Health Improvement.
7
2025, the Head of Strategic Planning & Health Improvement submitted a report seeking approval from the IJB on whether to approve the proposals set out in section 5 of the report and assessed in detail in the Integrated Impact Assessments appended to the report. The report provided updates on additional Sustainable Futures programme activity which had progressed concurrently alongside development of the Integrated Impact Assessments.
In relation to recommendation 2.2 of the report, Paul Ryan, seconded by Cath Cooney, moved
“That the IJB be asked to review the proposals with an aim to redesign the Childsmile Community and Practice programme, in light of the concerns raised by National Childsmile Executive team, the Oral Health Directorate and the British Dental Association; the high level of risk identified with only limited mitigation; the disproportionate impact on those children and families in lower socioeconomic groups; and the potential increase in the number of children requiring teeth removed under anaesthesia and bring back a paper to a future meeting of the IJB.”
In relation to recommendations 2.1 to 2.8 of the report, Councillor Cameron, seconded by Councillor Hughes, moved as an amendment “That while the IJB supports the strategic direction of travel of Sustainable Futures and the need for a transformational approach to deliver change, the IJB rejects the current tranche of proposals with the exception of proposal 9 (Section 5.5 – proposals 1-8). We are concerned that the impact of these proposals will result in greater costs for the IJB and are misaligned with the prevention and early intervention agenda. Given that the UK budget has been delayed which will impact on the timing of the Scottish Government budget, it remains to be clarified if IJB’s will receive further funding in the future.”
The Clerk requested that voting members confirm that there was unanimity in relation to all other recommendations detailed in the report. Voting members confirmed this was the case.
In terms of Standing Order 9.3, the Chair intimated that the vote would be taken by calling the roll.
On the roll being called, the following members voted for the amendment: Councillor J Cameron, Councillor Hughes, Councillor M MacLaren and Councillor McMillan.
The following members voted for the motion: Cath Cooney, Margaret Kerr, Jamie Kinlochan and Paul Ryan.
4 members voted for the motion and 4 members voted for the amendment. There being an equality of votes and there being no casting vote available to the Chair both the motion and amendment were not approved.
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 12.05 pm and reconvened at 12.15 pm.
In terms of Standing Order 9.4, the Chair advised that there was no consensus on this matter, that consideration of the matter would not be continued to a further meeting or a special meeting of the IJB and would not be referred to dispute resolution. The proposals in relation to recommendations 2.1 to 2.8 of the report fell.
The Chair then confirmed that in relation to this item of business, the decision of the IJB was:
“That the engagement process undertaken and how this had been reflected within the updated Integrated Impact Assessments for each proposal, as detailed in section 4 of the report, be noted;
That there being an equality of votes and there being no casting vote available to the Chair, it be noted that the proposals detailed at recommendations 2.1 to 2.8 in the report fell;
That the redesign of the District Nursing and Care at Home overnight service, as detailed in section 5 and Appendix 10 of the report be approved;
That the Cumulative Impact Assessment, as detailed in section 5 of the report and which formed Appendix 11 to the report, be noted;
That it be noted that an updated proposal for the locality home-based respite, as detailed in section 6 of the report, would be brought at a later date for approval;
That the additional programme updates provided in relation to the VR/VER process commencement and the review of Soft Facilities Management, as detailed in section 7 of the report, be noted;
That it be agreed that the Chief Officer and the Chair of the IJB refresh the current Sustainable Futures Programme Board to also act as a budget working group and which would lead on the process to develop high-level draft savings proposals for financial year 2026/27, which would be brought for discussion at an IJB development session in early December with the final proposals presented at a subsequent IJB meeting. The scale of savings required would reflect financial projections at that time, as detailed in section 8 of the report; and
That it be noted that, as included in the Sustainable Futures update to the IJB in June, HSCP officers would adopt a more transformational approach to financial planning in the medium to longer term and that further updates would be brought to future IJB meetings, as detailed in section 8 of the report.”
DECIDED:
(a) That the engagement process undertaken and how this had been reflected within the updated Integrated Impact Assessments for each proposal, as detailed in section 4 of the report, be noted;
(b) That there being an equality of votes and there being no casting vote available to the Chair, it be noted that the proposals detailed at recommendations 2.1 to 2.8 in the report fell;
(c) That the redesign of the District Nursing and Care at Home overnight service, as detailed in section 5 and Appendix 10 of the report be approved;
(d) That the Cumulative Impact Assessment, as detailed in section 5 of the report and which formed Appendix 11 to the report, be noted;
(e) That it be noted that an updated proposal for the locality home-based respite, as detailed in section 6 of the report, would be brought at a later date for approval;
(f) That the additional programme updates provided in relation to the VR/VER process commencement and the review of Soft facilities Management, as detailed in section 7 of the report, be noted;
(g) That it be agreed that the Chief Officer and the Chair of the IJB refresh the current Sustainable Futures Programme Board to also act as a budget working group and which would lead on the process to develop high-level draft savings proposals for financial year 2026/27, which would be brought for discussion at an IJB development session in early December with the final proposals presented at a subsequent IJB meeting. The scale of savings required would reflect financial projections at that time, as detailed in section 8 of the report; and
(h) That it be noted that, as included in the Sustainable Futures update to the IJB in June, HSCP officers would adopt a more transformational approach to financial planning in the medium to longer term and that further updates would be brought to future IJB meetings, as detailed in section 8 of the report.