16
There were submitted reports by the Chief Executive relative to the following applications for planning permission that required to be determined by the Board.
(A) 20/0793/PP - Ward 7: Erection of a grid stability facility, including grid stability unit with associated ancillary equipment, access, landscaping, drainage, car parking, operations centre and boundary enclosures at Neilston Grid Electricity Sub - Station Complex Gleniffer Road Paisley by WP Grid Services
Councillor McGurk, seconded by Councillor Devine, moved that the application be granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report and the applicants entering a Section 75 agreement to secure the reinstatement of off-site road repairs following the construction works. This was agreed.
DECIDED: That the application be granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report and the applicants entering a Section 75 agreement to secure the reinstatement of off-site road repairs following the construction works
(B) 20/0195/PP - Ward 9: Erection of holiday lodge at Site On Northern Boundary Of High Linthills Linthills Road Lochwinnoch by Mr R Seaton
Councillor McNaughtan, seconded by Councillor McGurk, moved that consideration of the application be continued for a site visit.
Councillor Doig, seconded by Councillor Rodden, moved as an amendment that the application be refused for the following reasons;
(i) The Roads infrastructure was not suitable for the anticipated increased traffic associated with the proposal;
(ii) The loss of biodiversity contrary to the Development Plan;
(iii) Creates an undesirable precedent in Clyde Muirshiel Regional Park; and
(iv) The overall development impact outweighs the resulting economic opportunity.
On the roll being called, the following members voted for the amendment: Councillors Binks, Brown, Devine, Andy Doig, Graham, J MacLaren, K MacLaren, M MacLaren, Paterson and Rodden.
The following members voted for the voted for the motion: Councillors Burns, McGurk, McNaughtan and Nicolson.
10 members having voted for the amendment and 4 members having voted for the motion, the amendment was accordingly declared carried.
DECIDED: That that the application be refused for the following reasons;
(i) The Roads infrastructure was not suitable for the anticipated increased traffic associated with the proposal;
(ii) The loss of biodiversity contrary to the Development Plan;
(iii) Creates an undesirable precedent in Clyde Muirshiel Regional Park; and
(iv) The overall development impact outweighs the resulting economic opportunity.
(C) 21/1022/PP - Ward 11 - Erection of residential development comprising 25 dwellinghouses at Mar Hall Mar Hall Drive Bishopton Renfrewshire PA7 5NW by Mar Estates Ltd.
Councillor McGurk, seconded by Councillor McNaughtan, moved that the application be granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report This was agreed.
During consideration of the application it was proposed that, as discussed previously by the Board, that details of parking arrangements associated with development proposals be included within the Report of Handling. This was agreed.
DECIDED:
(i) That the application be granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report; and
(ii) That it be further agreed that future reports include details of parking arrangements associated with development proposals within future Reports of Handling.
(D) 21/1130/PP - Ward 9 : Erection of 10 glamping pods at Bowfield Hotel And Country Club Bowfield Road Howwood Johnstone Renfrewshire PA9 1DZ by Manorview Group.
Councillor McNaughtan, seconded by Councillor McGurk, moved that the application be granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report.
Councillor Rodden, seconded by Councillor Andy Doig, moved as an amendment that the application be refused for the following reasons;
(i) The noise and disturbance associated with use of the pods would have an adverse impact on the amenity of nearby residents;
(ii) The scale, nature and siting of the development would not be compatible with neighbouring residential uses and consequently did not accord with Policy E4 of the Local Development;
(iii) The significant impact on local road and sewerage infrastructure;
(iv) The road infrastructure was not considered suitable for the increased traffic associated with the proposal; and
(v) The junction of the Bowfield Country Club, the B776 which was a rural road, was sub-standard and dangerous.
On the roll being called, the following members voted for the amendment: Councillors Binks, Brown, Burns, Devine, Andy Doig, Graham, J MacLaren, K MacLaren, M MacLaren, Paterson and Rodden
The following members voted for the voted for the motion: Councillors McGurk, McNaughtan and Nicolson.
11 members having voted for the amendment and 3 members having voted for the motion, the amendment was accordingly declared carried.
During consideration of the application it was proposed that the rationale for adopting the stated position in terms of traffic/road issues be included within the Report of Handling for all future applications. This was agreed.
DECIDED: That that the application be refused for the following reasons
(i) The noise and disturbance associated with use of the pods would have an adverse impact on the amenity of nearby residents;
(ii) The scale, nature and siting of the development would not be compatible with neighbouring residential uses and consequently did not accord with Policy E4 of the Local Development;
(iii) The significant impact on local road and sewerage infrastructure;
(iv) The road infrastructure was not considered suitable for the increased traffic associated with the proposal;
(v) The junction of the Bowfield Country Club, the B776 which was a rural road, was sub-standard and dangerous; and
(vi) That it be further agreed that the rationale for adopting the stated position in terms of traffic/road issues be included within the Report of Handling for all future applications.