11
There was submitted a report by the Director of Scotland Excel relative to the proposed contract rebates/supplier levy strategy and setting out an approach that Scotland Excel would adopt to embed rebate/supplier levy additions into appropriate contracts.
The report intimated that to date, Scotland Excel had relied almost exclusively on member requisitions to cover operating costs. The funding update provided summarised the current financial position and five-year projection for Scotland Excel. Within this, options to generate additional income were outlined, including the incorporation of volume rebates into appropriate contracts and current projections were that this could generate approximately £800,000 by 2023/24.
Despite the differences in approach, both methodologies could potentially derive additional income from contract expenditure. For volume rebates, a special condition was added to a contract where a defined percentage of the contract spend was paid by the supplier to the contracting authority. For supplier levy, a defined percentage was added to supplier invoices and as such paid by the buyer at the point of call-off.
It was noted that a key advantage of levies over rebates was that there was less of a time interval between contract call-off and recovery of the monies earned and that a key challenge when either was being considered was overcoming the risk that incorporating a rebate or a levy could adversely affect pricing on the contract. However, market analysis would suggest that if the level was maintained below around 0.75%, there was less of a likelihood of an adverse price variance.
It was anticipated that not all contract arrangements would lend themselves to incorporating rebates or levies. At contract strategy development, the inclusion of rebates would be considered on the basis of the nature of the contract, the goods or service provided, the market conditions and the anticipated supply base. Agreed outcomes would then become an integral part of the contract strategy, which would be subject to the normal level of review and consultation with the User Intelligence Group (UIG), and subsequently embedded into the tender documents. At the point of contract award, the rebate inclusion would become part of the terms and conditions of contract, and as such delivery would become a contractual commitment.
Some category activity within the current contract portfolio covered market segments in which the use of rebates was commonplace. The current contract for electrical and plumbing materials had generated an annual rebate in excess of £200,000 and this had been distributed to councils. The report proposed that any additional rebates generated would be held by Scotland Excel to support current and anticipated financial constraints, and to suppress the need to increase member requisitions for future development activity.
It was not intended that a rebate provision would be included within social care contracts and development of the social care contract offering was likely to be supported by rebates generated for other contract areas.
It was anticipated that further development and expansion of the scope of rebate inclusion across the portfolio provided support to enable the organisation to establish a sustainable financial position.
DECIDED: That the approach summarised for the inclusion of a rebate or supplier levy mechanism across appropriate areas of the contract portfolio be endorsed.