6
Under reference to item 8(b) of the Minute of the meeting of this Board held on 1 June 2023 and item 6(e) of the Minute of the meeting of this Board held on 17 May 2023, consideration was resumed of applications (d) and (f), respectively, for grant of Private Hire Car Drivers’ Licences and there were submitted applications (a), (b), (c), (e), (g) and (h) for grant of Private Hire Car Drivers’ Licences. Applicants (a), (b), (c), (e), (g) and (h) had been asked to appear personally for the first time and applicants (d) and (f) had been asked to appear personally for the second time together with Police Scotland who had submitted a representation to application (f) together with an objection received outwith the statutory timescale to the application and an objection received outwith the statutory timescale to application (h) together with a further letter in connection with that objection also received outwith the statutory timescale to the application:-
(a) Mohammed Bakhit
Mr Bakhit, the applicant, joined the meeting by video call. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.
(b) Ali Shah
Mr Shah, the applicant, joined the meeting by telephone call. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.
(c) Natnael Esayas
Mr Esayas, the applicant, joined the meeting by video call. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.
(d) Wajid Mahmood Yousaf Begum
Mr Begum, the applicant, joined the meeting by video call. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.
(e) Saqib Ali
Mr Ali, the applicant, joined the meeting by telephone call. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.
(f) David Walker
Mr Walker, the applicant, joined the meeting by video call together with Sergeant Moore-McGrath, who also joined the meeting by video call, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted a representation to the application and an objection received outwith the statutory timescale to the application.
On hearing the reasons for the lateness of the objection, the Convener proposed that the objection be taken into account when the application was being considered. This was agreed unanimously.
After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Board adjourned to allow members to consider this application. The meeting was reconvened and the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.
(g) Salman Khan
Mr Khan, the applicant, joined the meeting by video call. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.
(h) Keith Rainnie
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Rainnie, the applicant. Sergeant McGrath-Moore joined the meeting by video call, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted an objection received outwith the statutory timescale and a further letter in connection with that objection also received outwith the statutory timescale to the application. The Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued and that the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued and that the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board.