1
There were submitted the undernoted applications for Landlord Registration. The applicants had been asked to appear personally for the first time:-
(a) Christine Connarty
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Ms Connarty. The Assistant Managing Solicitor (Licensing) advised that this application had been granted under delegated authority for a period of three years.
DECIDED: That it be noted that the application had been granted under delegated authority for a period of three years.
(b) Christopher Mills
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Mills. The Convener proposed that the application be heard in Mr Mills’ absence. This was agreed unanimously. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on his registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on his registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board.
(c) Elaine Sheppard
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Ms Sheppard. The Assistant Managing Solicitor (Licensing) advised that this application had been granted under delegated authority for a period of three years.
DECIDED: That it be noted that the application had been granted under delegated authority for a period of three years.
(d) Philip Sheppard
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Sheppard. The Assistant Managing Solicitor (Licensing) advised that this application had been granted under delegated authority for a period of three years.
DECIDED: That it be noted that the application had been granted under delegated authority for a period of three years.
(e) Emma O’Hare
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Ms O’Hare. The Convener proposed that the application be heard in Ms O’Hare’s absence. This was agreed unanimously. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on her registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on her registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board.
(f) Gary Hill
Mr Hill, the applicant, joined the meeting by video call. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on his registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on his registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board.
(g) Karen Nonhebel
The Assistant Managing Solicitor (Licensing) advised that Ms Nonhebel was unable to attend the meeting and had requested that consideration of her application be continued. The Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on her registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on her registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board.
(h) Michael Farrell
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Farrell. The Assistant Managing Solicitor (Licensing) advised that this application had been granted under delegated authority for a period of three years.
DECIDED: That it be noted that the application had been granted under delegated authority for a period of three years.
(i) Nick Swan
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Swan. The Convener proposed that the application be heard in Mr Swan’s absence. This was agreed unanimously. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on his registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on his registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board.
(j) Pauline Goldfarb
The Assistant Managing Solicitor (Licensing) advised that Ms Goldfarb was unable to attend the meeting and had requested that consideration of her application be continued. The Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on her registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on her registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board.
(k) Sekhon Properties Limited
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Sekhon Properties Limited. The Assistant Managing Solicitor (Licensing) advised that this application had been granted under delegated authority for a period of three years.
DECIDED: That it be noted that the application had been granted under delegated authority for a period of three years.
(l) Thomas Conway
Mr Conway, the applicant, joined the meeting by video call. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on his registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to meet the obligations outstanding on his registration and that, if required, the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board.