15
There were submitted reports by the Director of Communities, Housing & Planning Services relative to the following applications for planning permission that required to be determined by the Board.
(
A) 19/0184/PP – WARD 12: ERECTION OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING 246 DWELLINGHOUSES AND FLATS WITH ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE, OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPING AT ERSKINE BRIDGE HOTEL, ERSKINE HARBOUR, ERSKINE PA8 6AN BY PERSIMMON HOMES LIMITED.
It was proposed that the Planning Authority hold a hearing under section 38A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 to allow the applicant and any person who had made a representation or objections to the application to address the Planning Authority on planning issues which arose from the following matters: environmental impact including flooding risks and impact on Local Environmental Designations (SINCs) and the impact on infrastructure including roads and education facilities (bearing in mind the Planning Authority’s role in Getting It Right for Every Child). This was agreed.
DECIDED: That the Planning Authority hold a hearing under section 38A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 to allow the applicant and any person who had made a representation or objections to the application to address the Planning Authority on planning issues which arose from the following matters: environmental impact including flooding risks and impact on Local Environmental Designations (SINCs) and the impact on infrastructure including roads and education facilities.
(B) 19/0843/PP – WARD 4: ERECTION OF HOTEL WITH CAR PARKING, ACCESS, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER ASSOCIATED WORKS AT LAND TO EAST OF NO 1 MARCHBURN DRIVE, GLASGOW AIRPORT, PAISLEY BY CAIRN HOTELS GROUP.
It was proposed that consideration of the application be continued for a site visit. This was agreed.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued for a site visit.
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
Councillor James MacLaren having previously declared an interest in the following item of business remained in the meeting but took no part in the discussion or decision.
(C) 20/0102/PP – WARD 11: FORMATION OF COMMERCIAL FISHERY WITH ASSOCIATED ACCESS, PARKING, MODULAR BUILDING AND LANDSCAPING AT LAND AT HADDOCKSTON ESTATE, WEST GLEN ROAD, HOUSTON, JOHNSTONE BY MR CAMPBELL.
It was proposed that consideration of the application be continued for a site visit. This was agreed.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued for a site visit.
(D) 20/0120/PP – WARD 2: ERECTION OF CLASS 4 (BUSINESS), CLASS 5 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) AND CLASS 6 (STORAGE & DISTRIBUTION) DEVELOPMENT, WITH ASSOCIATED ACCESS, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING (IN PRINCIPLE) AT 127 WRIGHT STREET, RENFREW PA4 8AN BY 3663 DEVELOPMENTS LTD.
It was proposed that the application be granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report. This was agreed.
DECIDED: That the application be granted subject to conditions.
(E) 20/0171/PP – WARD 8: FORMATION OF VEHICLE DELIVERY AND STORAGE COMPOUND WITH ASSOCIATED WORKS, INCLUDING BOUNDARY FENCING AT LAND AT PHOENIX PARK, LINWOOD ROAD, PAISLEY BY ARNOLD CLARK AUTOMOBILES LIMITED.
It was proposed that the application be granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report. This was agreed.
DECIDED: That the application be granted subject to conditions.
(F) 20/0217/PP – WARD 4: ERECTION OF STUDENT ACCOMODATION, PARTIAL DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDING WITH FAÇADE RETENTION AND ASSOCIATED EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS AND ERECTION OF BIN STORE AT TA CENTRE, 76 HIGH STREET, PAISLEY PA1 2BA BY JR CONSTRUCTION SCOTLAND LIMITED.
Councillor McGurk, seconded by Councillor Nicolson moved that the application be granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report.
Councillor K MacLaren, seconded by Councillor Andy Doig, moved as a first amendment that the application be refused.
Councillor Burns, seconded by Councillor Mags MacLaren, moved as a second amendment that consideration of the application be continued for a site visit.
On the roll being called between the motion and the first amendment, the following members voted for the motion: Councillors Brown, McCulloch, McGurk, McNaughtan, Montgomery, Nicolson and Rodden.
The following members voted for the first amendment: Councillors Binks, Burns, Andy Doig, Don, J MacLaren, K MacLaren, M MacLaren; and Strang.
8 members having voted for the first amendment and 7 members having voted for the motion, a vote was then taken between the first amendment and second amendment. On the roll being called between the first amendment and the second amendment, the following members voted for the first amendment: Councillors Binks, Andy Doig and K MacLaren.
The following members voted for the second amendment: Councillors Brown, Burns, Don, J MacLaren, M MacLaren, McCulloch, McGurk, McNaughtan, Montgomery, Nicolson, Rodden and Strang.
12 members having voted for the second amendment and 3 members having voted for the first amendment, the second amendment was accordingly declared carried.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued for a site visit.
(G) 20/0218/LB – WARD 4: ERECTION OF STUDENT ACCOMODATION, PARTIAL DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDING WITH FAÇADE RETENTION AND ASSOCIATED EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS AND ERECTION OF BIN STORE AT TA CENTRE, 76 HIGH STREET, PAISLEY PA1 2BA BY JR CONSTRUCTION SCOTLAND LIMITED.
It was proposed that in view of the decision decision taken in respect of (F) above consideration of this application be continued. This was agreed.
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued.
(H) 20/0278/PP – WARD 9: ERECTION OF TEN GLAMPING PODS AT BOWFIELD HOTEL AND COUNTRY CLUB, BOWFILED ROAD, HOWWOOD, JOHNSTONE PA9 1DZ BY MANORVIEW GROUP.
Councillor McGurk, seconded by Councillor Rodden, moved that consideration of the application be continued for a site visit.
Councillor Andy Doig, seconded by Councillor Binks, moved as an amendment that the application be refused as: (a)The proposal was contrary to Policy E4 – Tourism, as the additional visitors generated from the proposal would have a significant impact on existing infrastructure, in particular sewerage and the local road network; and
(b) There would also be an adverse impact on the amenity of the area, which was within the Green Belt.
On the roll being called the following members voted for the amendment: Councillors Binks, Andy Doig, Don, J MacLaren, K MacLaren, M MacLaren, McCulloch, McNaughtan, Montgomery and Strang.
The following members voted for the motion: Councillors Brown, Burns, McGurk, Nicolson and Rodden.
10 members having voted for the amendment and 5 members having voted for the motion, the amendment was accordingly declared carried.
DECIDED: That the application be refused as:
(a)The proposal was contrary to Policy E4 – Tourism, as the additional visitors generated from the proposal would have a significant impact on existing infrastructure, in particular sewerage and the local road network; and
(b) There would also be an adverse impact on the amenity of the area, which was within the Green Belt.